Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ASK's avatar

Any patient who is told they have cancer and is consulting an oncologist regarding chemo and other drugs, should insist on being given the medical data safety sheets regarding the drug and it’s side effects. And then also research the age of those drugs. Most of that will scare you more than the cancer itself, with “low” side effect occurrence is in a 10-30% range.

And then when you realize that most of the drugs are older than you are, you will question WHERE all of the billions of dollars of “Cancer Research” money have gone. You will never donate another dime.

They are not telling you that a myriad of alternative treatments are helpful against cancer (many doctors believe it is parasites, mold and toxins), because CANCER is all about MONEY. It’s not about your health, it’s about keeping you alive long enough to make a bid wad of cash.

And if you get to the point where you reject their treatment, past the psychological guilt and tactics they use, know that you have a spine of steel. Most people acquiesce and do what they are told.

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

First, why is the vaccine chief focusing on cancer and not stopping the clot shots (which are linked to cancer)? Same reason why Kennedy isn't stopping the emergency that his predecessor extended and same reason why Makary is promoting modeling instead of real testing.

Join this letter to them!

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/not-for-sale-an-open-letter-to-hhs

When one has cancer or another so called terminal disease gets treated with a toxic infusion or drug and dies, they usually give the disease the credit of death ignoring the toxicity of the "treatments".

https://robc137.substack.com/p/allergic-to-bullshit

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts