Dr. Vinay Prasad, FDA’s new vaccine chief, denounces both mainstream and alternative cancer therapies, calling for real science and transparency in drug approval, while highlighting the power of oxygen and bicarbonate as promising cancer treatments.
Any patient who is told they have cancer and is consulting an oncologist regarding chemo and other drugs, should insist on being given the medical data safety sheets regarding the drug and it’s side effects. And then also research the age of those drugs. Most of that will scare you more than the cancer itself, with “low” side effect occurrence is in a 10-30% range.
And then when you realize that most of the drugs are older than you are, you will question WHERE all of the billions of dollars of “Cancer Research” money have gone. You will never donate another dime.
They are not telling you that a myriad of alternative treatments are helpful against cancer (many doctors believe it is parasites, mold and toxins), because CANCER is all about MONEY. It’s not about your health, it’s about keeping you alive long enough to make a bid wad of cash.
And if you get to the point where you reject their treatment, past the psychological guilt and tactics they use, know that you have a spine of steel. Most people acquiesce and do what they are told.
First, why is the vaccine chief focusing on cancer and not stopping the clot shots (which are linked to cancer)? Same reason why Kennedy isn't stopping the emergency that his predecessor extended and same reason why Makary is promoting modeling instead of real testing.
When one has cancer or another so called terminal disease gets treated with a toxic infusion or drug and dies, they usually give the disease the credit of death ignoring the toxicity of the "treatments".
What I'm smelling from this move is that the same agencies which have failed for 100 years plus at "helping" to "keep us safe" have proven themselves. Any attempt by these same failed organisations to regulate our medicines should be dismissed immediately and harshly. Accountability is way long overdue and failure to act swiftly to provide justice can only now be seen as aiding and abeiting known criminal organisations, proven guilty of pre meditated mass murder over multiple generations.
I can't believe he bases his argument on an old tumor measuring idea! But he's wrong about current guidelines... there's no 30% reduction in tumor size as the goal for cancer drugs... the bar is just that there is no growth... for a month. Is he signaling that he's coming after repurchased drugs? Or is his goal to prove vaccines don't cause cancer? This is strange
I dont accept that he had any authority to say various alternative treatments and for example, Ivermectin and Fenben do not work. Something is not ringing true. 😡
Any patient who is told they have cancer and is consulting an oncologist regarding chemo and other drugs, should insist on being given the medical data safety sheets regarding the drug and it’s side effects. And then also research the age of those drugs. Most of that will scare you more than the cancer itself, with “low” side effect occurrence is in a 10-30% range.
And then when you realize that most of the drugs are older than you are, you will question WHERE all of the billions of dollars of “Cancer Research” money have gone. You will never donate another dime.
They are not telling you that a myriad of alternative treatments are helpful against cancer (many doctors believe it is parasites, mold and toxins), because CANCER is all about MONEY. It’s not about your health, it’s about keeping you alive long enough to make a bid wad of cash.
And if you get to the point where you reject their treatment, past the psychological guilt and tactics they use, know that you have a spine of steel. Most people acquiesce and do what they are told.
I will say that Dr Sircus is one doctor that provides excellent advice in this regard for alternatives.
First, why is the vaccine chief focusing on cancer and not stopping the clot shots (which are linked to cancer)? Same reason why Kennedy isn't stopping the emergency that his predecessor extended and same reason why Makary is promoting modeling instead of real testing.
Join this letter to them!
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/not-for-sale-an-open-letter-to-hhs
When one has cancer or another so called terminal disease gets treated with a toxic infusion or drug and dies, they usually give the disease the credit of death ignoring the toxicity of the "treatments".
https://robc137.substack.com/p/allergic-to-bullshit
What I'm smelling from this move is that the same agencies which have failed for 100 years plus at "helping" to "keep us safe" have proven themselves. Any attempt by these same failed organisations to regulate our medicines should be dismissed immediately and harshly. Accountability is way long overdue and failure to act swiftly to provide justice can only now be seen as aiding and abeiting known criminal organisations, proven guilty of pre meditated mass murder over multiple generations.
I can't believe he bases his argument on an old tumor measuring idea! But he's wrong about current guidelines... there's no 30% reduction in tumor size as the goal for cancer drugs... the bar is just that there is no growth... for a month. Is he signaling that he's coming after repurchased drugs? Or is his goal to prove vaccines don't cause cancer? This is strange
I dont accept that he had any authority to say various alternative treatments and for example, Ivermectin and Fenben do not work. Something is not ringing true. 😡